On Apr 24, 2:08*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Apr 24, 11:25 am, Art Unwin wrote:



On Apr 24, 10:47 am, "Dave" wrote:

"Art Unwin" wrote in message

....
On Apr 24, 7:48 am, Art Unwin wrote:

Please allow me to correct myself on the above

you never did answer my question, but thats ok, you never have before
either... now you try parsing the language and think that provides
insight... just write the equation, what is equilibrium in your mind? i
know this is tough, you are so far out of balance anyway, but try to
amuse
me a bit and write a concise definition of 'equilibrium'.

I will be happy to David
It is balance as referred to by the mathematical equal (=) term where

so any equation with an equals sign is in equilibrium?? *that applies to
everything then, since all equations contain an equals sign they are all in
equilibrium by definition. *my i'm glad you explained that art, i might have
gone through life never knowing that by taking e=ir and rewriting it as
e-ir=0 i have put ohms law in equilibrium and then all is well with the
universe! *so the conversion of mass to energy in the famous equation e=mc^2
is really in equilibrium as e-mc^2=0, so no mass is converted to energy or
vice versa! *wow, what a revelation! *thanks again art!

Well not exactly. The innards of the arbitary boundary must be in a
state of equilibrium
thus when making the arbitrary field a dynamic field by adding time or
such things as radiators the innards must stay in equilibrium. Thus if
radiators are added they also must be in equilibrium which requires
all to be approximately one WL or the equivalent of one or more
periods of the frequency in use. Thus the majoritory of added
radiators may be the one of choice in terms of feed point