Jim,

I don't have the measurement capabilities that some of you folk have,
so I'm just using EZNEC as my "experimental equipment". I'm being
assured that it's representative of what I would see "for real", and
it's easier pressing keys than building new test equipment Are you
suggesting that "real world" current measurements would be
significantly different than the EZNEC predictions?

I gather from your response that you feel the Corum model is
inappropriate for the "bugcatcher", but you're not advocating an
alternative? That's the part I struggle with - if a model gets close
(albeit not perfect) to predicting "real world" performance, and
there's no other alternative being put forward, I don't see the reason
for rejecting it so forcefully?

73,
Steve G3TXQ


On May 8, 8:21*pm, Jim Kelley wrote

Hi Steve,

Personally, I think some actual measurements would help enormously in
formulating/evaluating a model. *Otherwise all we have is hand waving
and proselytizing.

73, ac6xg