IS THIS THE RETURN OF THE "(UN)FAIRNESS DOCTRINE?"
On May 9, 5:47*pm, dave wrote:
wrote:
ery
media outlet everywhere.
The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
political atmosphere. *Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
interest.
"Poisonous" as defined by whom? Little Liberal Fascist Diktators in
your local Hitlery "It Takes A Village"?
There is no better way to determine satisfaction of a licensees
obligation of serving the public than the Public actually listening.
Through which the radio station gains its Market Share Rating and
allows the station to make enough advertizing revenue to continue
opperating. If Free Market Capitalism (you and me consuming radio
product) is not allowed to operate than WHO/WHAT will decide which
stations continue to operate? A Politician? An 0baMa0 appointed
Liberal Fascist/Neo-Communist? Kiss your freedom goodbye. And
Dr.DaviD, you can kiss my ass!
Newspapers can print whatever they like, because anybody can start a
newspaper. *Spectrum is a finite commodity. *They cannot be coralled and
used to further political objectives of the capital class to the
detriment of everyone else.
Ah yes! A typical Liberal Fascist explaination. The "Capital Class".
As if that excludes everyone except rich as defined by 0baMaoists -
bwaHAHAHAHAHA!
Yes, Dr.DaviD - Heil 0baMao Hitler - our great leader will decide what
is good for every single individual Serf. **** OFF YOU LIL'NEO-COMMIE
IMBECILE!
|