In article ,
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com" wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2009 16:57:27 -0700,
Telamon wrote:
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com wrote:
Telamon wrote:
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) www.LayoffRemedy.com wrote:
Telamon wrote:


I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
else.

CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can

Clue: It's the "unfairness doctrine."

Wrong. Because it requires BOTH sides of issues to be
presented EQUALLY. And *that* is FAIR.

I'm right and you know it ...

Being DELUSIONAL clearly is your long suit! LOL!!!

Ok, so you are a complete moron.

For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.

ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.

You mean to say all media should required to present the
point of view you like and that's it.

Wrong! I mean to present both sides as the FACTS make
clear. Are you **afraid** of relevant FACTS?

Get this through your very thick head. What you intend has
no basis on what the liberal Dem's intend to do.

LOL!! Whatever they do, it would be EXPONENTIALLY BETTER
than the CRAP that Warmonger-in-Thief GW Bush laid on us!!

He didn't do anything retard. Free speech does not need new regulation
by the Obominator.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California