"Tom Donaly" wrote
...
Szczepan Bia³ek wrote:

U¿ytkownik "Richard Clark" napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
...
On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:00:56 +0200, Szczepan Bia?ek
wrote:

But not by you, in 2009. Are you too bored with the topic to turn on
a radio to confirm?

I took a glance on my very old radio (it has the all waves) yesterday.

And you didn't even turn it on. Now THAT is lazy.

I collect evidences that Radio Waves are longitudinal.

You are not actually "doing" anything at all.

The most valuable was your statement: " An antenna radiates in ALL
directions from EVERYPOINT of
the antenna."
It meens for me that they are longitudinal. In ALL directions like
acoustics. From EVERYPOINT (of the end). In today's antennas before the
end are cabels in which the current oscyllates. EM waves radiate from
this part of the circuit where the current oscillate (in end no current).
In the end the electrons gathers periodically and radiate alternate
electric field in ALL directions.
Has it sense?
S*

So why do you post here?

Is another group on antennas?
S*

No, it hasn't sense. You need to post on the physics newsgroup where your
ideas will be appreciated by all the self-anointed geniuses who
think they understand electro-magnetics. Nothing anyone writes here is
going to convince you you're wrong.

It is not the case. I am asking about some details and some of you simply
give them me.

People with pet theories never give them up.

Transversal vs. longitudinal is not theory. Next experiments are necessary.

This newsgroup has become a repository for flawed physical theories. Maybe,
someday, it will get back to being a forum for hams who just want to
discuss antennas.

Is it something wrong if a visitors asks about something?
S*
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH