View Single Post
  #55   Report Post  
Old May 17th 09, 02:42 PM posted to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.news-media,alt.religion.christian,alt.politics.economics
Gary Forbis Gary Forbis is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 42
Default Friedman Predicts the Destruction of the Dollar

On May 16, 11:30*am, wrote:
On May 16, 12:06*pm, Gary Forbis wrote:





On May 16, 6:29*am, wrote:


On May 16, 7:30*am, dave wrote:
Then why do the red states get more tax money per capita than the blue
states? *Defense spending is redistribution too.


Because employees in Blue States pay more State and local taxes thus
paying less Federal taxes. *Therefor, Blue States receive less Fedaral
Tax money.


You're just wrong about federal taxes.
Data fromhttp://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22685.html
who got it from the Federal Government.


Here's the 2005 sugar dadies:
State, Recieved per dollar spent, 2004 vote, 2008 vote.
New Jersey, 0.61, Blue, Blue
Nevada, 0.65, Red, Blue
Connecticut, 0.69, Blue, Blue
New Hampshire, 0.71, Blue, Blue
Minnesota, 0.72, Blue, Blue
Illinois, 0.75, Blue, Blue
Deleware, 0.77, Blue, Blue
California, 0.78, Blue, Blue
New York, 0.79, Blue, Blue
Colorado, 0.81, Red, Blue
Massachusetts, 0.82, Blue, Blue
Wisconsin, 0.86, Blue, Blue
Washington, 0.88, Blue, Blue
Michigan, 0.92, Blue, Blue
Oregon, 0.93, Blue, Blue
Texas, 0.94, Red, Red
Florida, 0.97, Red, Blue


Rhode Island broke even, blue in both elections.


The welfare queens:
District of Columbia, 5.55, Blue, Blue
New Mexico, 2.03, Red, Blue
Mississippi, 2.02, Red, Red
Alaska, 1.84, Red, Red
Louisiana, 1.78, Red, Red
West Verginia, 1.76, Red, Red
North Dakota, 1.68, Red, Red
Alabama, 1.66, Red, Red
South Dakota, 1.53, Red, Red
Kentucky, 1.51, Red, Red
Virginia, 1.51, Red, Blue
Montana, 1.47, Red, Red
Hawaii, 1.44, Blue, Blue
Arkansas, 1.41, Red, Red
Maine, 1.41, Blue, Blue
Oklahoma, 1.36, Red, Red
South Carolina, 1.35, Red, Red
Missouri, 1.32, Red, Red
Maryland, 1.30, Blue, Blue
Tennessee, 1.27, Red, Red
Idaho, 1.21, Red, Red
Arizona, 1.19, Red, Red
Kansas, 1.12, Red, Red
Wyoming, 1.11, Red, Red
Iowa, 1.10, Red, Blue
Nebraska, 1.10, Red, Red
North Carolina, 1.08, Red, Blue
Vermont, 1.08, Blue, Blue
Pennsylvania, 1.07, Blue, Blue
Utah, 1.07, Red, Red
Indiana, 1.05, Red, Blue
Ohio, 1.05, Red, Blue
Georgia, 1.01, Red, Red


You're just regurgitating what infant Dr.DaviD just burped.
I guess we'll have to wait until you learn how to read.


While I was going to let this go--It's futile to argue against
stupidity--I think I'll help you out.

You wrote:

Because employees in Blue States pay more State and
local taxes thus paying less Federal taxes. Therefor,
Blue States receive less Fedaral Tax money.

What is your measure of "more state and local taxes"?
Do you understand that per capita is the only meaningful
meansure for comparison between states? Otherwise you're
wrong on the face of it because California and New York,
two blue states, pay the most federal taxes due to their
population alone.

The figures above show states that pay more per capita
in federal taxes than they recieve are usually blue and
those who recieve more than they pay are usually red.

I don't know but suspect the highest cost of living states
are mostly blue states and the lowest red so even in
absolute numbers the red states are welfare queens.
Rather than being rugged individualists the red states
are the tax whores who can't make it on their own.