Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
Certainly a far cry from the idea you tried to sell on this newsgroup
that interference patterns cause northbound vehicles to move in a
southbound direction and southbound vehicles to move in a northbound
direction.

Or is it that you still don't understand the FSU web page?

:-) Why are there never any examples provided to support these
'suggestions' of yours?

So now you minimize the fact that you argued vehemently with everyone
for endless months over your malformed ideas about how energy moves in
impedance matching systems. After I found the Melles-Griot web page
which seemed to support your idea, I realized the idea was physically
impossible and tried to persuade you away from it. I let you know in
every way I could that you had it wrong, and gave you every possible
example of it that I could think of, and in the process you called me
every nasty insulting thing you could think of. So yeah, I guess I do
have a tendency not to overlook it as easily as you do.

If
you will mail me a Xerox of your posterior, I will kiss
it and send it back to you if that would help.

No, but an admission that for months you behaved like a horse's
posterior would.

Sure sounds like interference corresponds to (rather than
causes) the redistribution of photon energy as described on
the FSU web page.

Yes it does. In fact that's one of the many ways I explained it to you
back when you wrote about how stupid, ignorant, and wrong I was about it
and how everyone from Galileo to Eugene Hecht agreed with you. What I
don't recall is ever seeing you take any of that back.

ac6xg