On Sat, 23 May 2009 16:40:22 -0700 (PDT), mr1956
wrote:
Maximum
velocity was about Mach 3 which is why a conventional antenna cannot
be used as it will be melted by friction.
Would seem to be at odds with:
This new antenna will be mounted
totally on the exterior of the airframe and angled back only about 10
degrees to give a better radiation pattern.
At Mach 3, I seriously doubt you could hold it as erect (80 degrees to
the fuselage) as you might try with smaller wire (in fact, I would say
it would be plastered down).
If your telemetry is directly below its ascendance, you might try a
full-wave or longer antenna trailing below (if it can withstand the
propulsion heat). If that is not possible, look into an inverted F:
http://www.qsl.net/kb7qhc/antenna/In...%20F/index.htm
(it doesn't have to be a thick antenna).
73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC