View Single Post
  #32   Report Post  
Old May 28th 09, 01:00 AM posted to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.news-media,alt.religion.christian,alt.politics.economics
[email protected] TianMeiguo@gmail.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 123
Default The Left's Guerilla War

On May 27, 12:06*pm, Michael Coburn wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009 14:18:59 +0900, Brenda Ann wrote:
"Gary Forbis" wrote in message
news:2ffa9ccc-


...

So, Is the conservative or liberal point of view to impose their will
upon the woman?


Consider this. *Suppose a quadraplegic takes up residence in your home
without your permission. *Do you then become responsible for the care of
this human being? *If you say no then why does a woman become
responsbile for some human who takes up residency in her womb without
her permission?


Has she not, by virtue of having had the requisite coitus, given defacto
permission (rape notwithstanding)?


No. *She has not given permission for it. *She accented to sex. *Not to
motherhood. Perhaps the male lied and told her he had been "fixed" or
that he would use a condom, or, or, or. *The "intent" of the act was not
necessarily motherhood. *She could also have been mistaken about her own
ovulation periods. *There is not (regardless of your particular opinions)
a prohibition on sex except that it be a necessary "evil" for procreation..


How else did you expect a PubliK Liberal Fascist Neo-Commie School
drop-out to increase her welfare income?