On May 29, 5:27*am, Gary Forbis wrote:
On May 29, 4:35*am, dxAce wrote:

Michael W. Bryant, the totally confused dufus who once claimed to have a PhD,
wrote:
Please, show us the mental masturbation you are so good at.

Lying about having a PhD is mental retardation, dufus boy!

How is this responsive? *One needn't have a PhD to understand logic.
I have no degree at all. *I learned Boolean logic while in the 6th
grade
by being a sounding board for my dad as he was learning it.
Interestingly
his text book introduced many wacky techniques to help optomize a
formula and thereby reduce the number of components to implement it
in an electronic device.

- I suspect RHF doesn't know how to use predicate logic.

How Would You Know . . . What I Know ?

-*Many on the right (and left) would be well served
- by learning the rules of logic so that they can
- discuss issues rationally and improve their
- arguments rather than attempting to twist
- other's words.

For 'many' on the Left (and Right) Feelings Are Facts :
* I 'feel' what I know.
* I know what I 'feel'
* Those Are My Factual 'Feelings'
-and- Your Facts
-and- Your Knowing
Can Not Will Not Change Them.
{Your Reality Is Not My Reality}
+ Feelings Trump Logic
+ Feelings Trump Rational Reasoning
= My Feelings Trump Your Arguments

-*Clarity of thought rather than strength
- of conviction is the surest way to the
- truth of the matter.

The Clarity of the Strength of Conviction
Is The Truth of the Matter : For Those
Who 'Feel' That They Are Justly Right.

- I'm trying to bring him along but it's hard
- to help someone who doesn't know how
- to determine the validity of an argument
- let alone the soundness of one.

GF - Ah Shucks - I hope that I am not
hurting you 'feelings'. - idtars ~ RHF