Sun Spots
Dave wrote:
"tom" wrote in message
snip
With total disregard
tom
K0TAR
I know, but its fun asking the one pertinent question that he can't
answer. he keeps saying i reject his addition of the (t) term to Gauss'
Law, and won't accept the answer that it is redundant since the law is
not dependent on time, it is true for all time. So the (t) is not
necessary at best and misleading at worst... you can put it there, but
it doesn't mean anything... its kind of like saying f(t)=f(t), a simple
truism.
I know, but I couldn't resist.
tom
K0TAR
|