View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old June 27th 09, 06:23 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Bushcraftgregg Bushcraftgregg is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2009
Posts: 380
Default Media keeps suggesting that drugs are responsible for the deathof Michael Jackson.

On Jun 26, 11:29*pm, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote:
"Bushcraftgregg" wrote in message
....
On Jun 26, 5:05 pm, wrote:
The police should investigate all the people who have extorted Michael
Jackson, over the years.


Drugs didn't kill Michael Jackson. The people who slandered Jackson
burdened his heart -he lasted far longer than anybody similarily
attacked.


I can say this much, and of course it is just my opinion.


But from everything I know and have studied
for sixteen years about deception, be
it from body language or the voice and
recently through handwriting analysis.


There was absolutely NOTHING, ziltch -
nada that led me to believe that he was
nothing but honest in answering allegations
of child molestation.


Ninety nine per cent of the time when someone
is either being deceptive or just flat out lying
there is some sign, be it body language or even the tonality of
specific words depending on what the question was or actual physical
signs are visible.


If this was truly the case and IMO he was completely
innocent of those charges, MANY MANY people
owe this man an apology.


I, too have huge doubts about the allegations against Jackson.


There are two possibilities he


1) *Jackson did nothing, and these two families were gold diggers looking to
get rich quick through allegations of sexual misconduct that are difficult
to impossible to defend against.


OR


2) Jackson did molest the kids, and the parents are still gold diggers, and
some of the worst parents on the planet. *Would any parent that cared about
their child let someone slide on molesting their child just because someone
gave them money to keep quiet?


Hell, yes...please don't be naive, Brenda.


I'll just throw this in Joe. Brenda is far from
naive. ;-)