neoconis_ignoramus wrote:

Jim Alder wrote:
John Barnard wrote:
m II wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote:

Her logic is bizarre, to say the least... who's going to vote for a
president that may quit mid-term to go off and write a book?

* * Clinton quit his last term as governor to run for president after
specifically promising not to do so when running for that last term.

* *Ya voted for HIM, didn't you?

Um, dumb****,

WHAT, ****4brains?

did PLAIN[SIC] quit to run for president?

I don't know. Maybe. Did she promise NOT to? That was kind of my point,
since Clinton LIED, saying specifically that he would NOT do that to win the
election, then went ahead and did it anyway.

Sorry, I thought that was clear to the simplest slackjawed yokel, but I
didn't know YOU would be reading it.

Of course, Obama said in 2004 that he was NOT running for president in
2008 because he had just taken office and wouldn't know what he was doing if
he won the presidency.

So you can't say he didn't warn you, but I fail to get why you now hold
this against Palin.

Seems to me that
she couldve done this, you know, like when the presdiential race
actually started. In two years.

I guess it depends on what plans she has in the immediate future. You don't
know and neither do I, so your latest expression of comtempt and hatred for
everything not Liberal is once again based on nothing but your hatred of
everything not Liberal.

LOL - drooling conservadolts fawning over the Queen of Ignorance.

Leave your mom out of this, **** head.

--
So, how's that whole "hopey - changey"
thing working out for you so far?