BDK wrote:
says...
BDK wrote:
says...
John Barnard wrote:
m II wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote:
Her logic is bizarre, to say the least... who's going to vote for a
president that may quit mid-term to go off and write a book?
Clinton quit his last term as governor to run for president after
specifically promising not to do so when running for that last term.
Ya voted for HIM, didn't you?
I seriously doubt he did. Maybe you can figure out why...
First I would need to figure out why you think Brenda Ann is a 'him.'
Did
Mommy skip that lesson?
Then I would need to be the type of idiot who plays the stupid "I know
something you don't - can you 'figure it out?" game you leftwing morons
like
to play. And that will be the day.
LOL, I thought you were posting to John Barnard, ooops.
Yes, that whole "" thing is a complicated code to crack.
I'm not a huge Obama fan, but we have to give him time to reverse the
mess he was left with before we give him a final score, right?
Hmmm, let's see. We were talking about Sarah Palin leaving the office of
governor early and how that disqualified her for the presidency, and I asked
why Clinton didn't suffer the same condemnation when he promised not to leave
early, so your logical progression to the discussion is: "Shouldn't we give
Obama more time to fix things?"??
Okay, I'll play along.
I was willing to wait. OBAMA was the one who called for a final vote when
he said the stimulus worked.
Even a rightwing moron waits until the game is over before declaring a
winner,
right?
I wouldn't know what a rightwing moron does or thinks, but do you recall
when the "worst presidency in history" accusations first started during the
Bush administration? I'm remembering the great patience the Left had while
calling the 'surge' a failure before it had even started. Same for the
invasion of Baghdad. Come to think, the tax cuts didn't exactly get a full
count either.
Want to try again?
--
So, how's that whole "hopey - changey"
thing working out for you so far?