Jim Alder wrote:
John Barnard wrote:
Jim Alder wrote:
John Barnard wrote:
That he has no facts and no sense.
You can go now.
plonk
Here's one for ya. Jimmy:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25190.html
Enjoy!
Not a witness. No evidence. Just another politician taking the easy
PC
non-controversial route.
You do know that McCain's lawyers scoped out BHO's legitimacy to be
president
and found nothing.
No, but since the bone of contention here is that there is not
sufficent
evidence, I'm not surprised McCain found nothing. Let me know when someone
finds "something" will ya?
I understand that Democrats tried to say McCain was ineligible for
the
presidency because he was born in Panama, which he was, and that McCain
supplied the documentation needed.
Oh wait, Hawaii once again examines Obama's
BC and verifies it.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090728/...th_certificate
Yep. I heard about it this morning. That's the second time Fukino has
called a press conference to tell everyone "Yep, we got it right here." Of
course, I also heard it was destroyed when the office went 'paperless' a
while
back. Don't you think it would be simpler to just get a certified copy and
show it to interested parties?
Other than "why should he?" that is. Why should Fukino put on a show
twice? Why should the governor do the same?
You guys seem to have a problem with pigmentation and not documentation
...
Does it really seem that way? Show me one statement or even
implication
that I have made that makes it 'seem' that way to you? In fact, show me a
statement I have ever made that fits that bill.
In fact, it seems to me that you people are once again taking the easy
way
out, accusing people of racism just to shut them up because YOU don't have
an
answer to my fairly simple question.
And you refuse to acknowledge the answer. The answers don't fit your
kooktard conspiracy world. But just to kick some sense into you here goes:
Wait! I thought you were going to show me examples of my racism! What
happened? You don't think you can call me a racist and then just move on, do
you?
1. 2007, Obama's campaign releases a certified copy of his Certificate
of Life Birth which gives has Obama as being born on Aug. 4, 1961.
A certificate that anyone in Hawaii could get no matter where they were
born. All they had to do was lie a little.
That's bull**** and you know it. That little item didn't pop until 20
years after HBO was born.
2. Hawaiian Department of Health spokesmen state that it has Obama's
"original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies
and procedures."
Carefully parsed words that said nothing.
Are you saying that the officials are lying about what they have in
their possession?
3. All court cases to date concerning Obama's BC and his validity to be
President fall flat on their asses.
Booted on the same technicality, with no examination, let alone ruling,
of their facts.
Factcheck.org did their checking and examined the document and found no
issues whatsoever. BTW, it's a non-partisan organization.
4. McCain's lawyers find nothing.
Doesn't mean there's nothing to be found.
Yawn - that the best you can do? I give items and you give rhetoric -
you lose.
5. Kenyan birth certificate circulated by dumbass Orly Taitz is shown to
be fraudulent.
HAS it now!?
Yes, it has.
All evidence goes against Obama being born in Kenya and that includes
Berg's mishandling of Sarah Obama's comments. You don't even have a
shred of reasonable doubt; you just don't like the answers.
Most of them are dodges, not answers. Berg did not 'mishandle' her
comments. The translator present in the room swore otherwise, but you would
prefer to believe another of Obama's relatives who is keeping up the defense.
Have you even read the translation? The one where Sarah Obama says BHO
was bornin Hawaii?
Which begs the question: are you just a kooktard or a dumbass racist?
And the answer is no.
Enjoy your delusions!
Keep hiding, lightweight.
Lightweight? You haven't provided a single shred of evidence to give
support to your claims. You fall into the kooktard category.