"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
So the question remains where does a photon come from if it is not an
internal function of a free electron. Frankly the capacitor suggests
that the photon is a charge possesed by
a free electron.

photons have no charge.

So again we are back to the Gauss/Maxwell question.

separate guass and maxwell. gauss wrote laws, maxwell made a collection of
equations and tied them all together... some of which were written
originally by gauss. the basic laws that went into maxwell's collection
have been well proven separately for over a century, and as a collection to
explain electromagnetic waves almost as long. but note that maxwell does
not talk about particles, his equations describe fields and waves. They do
contain terms for charge, but do not tie it to any given particle... and if
you include the force equation then you can talk about mass and charge, but
again not tied to any specific particle.

Einstein insinuated that the weak force is part of radiation and I
have applied my theorem to that.

ah, so that is where you have crossed up the weak for and radiation...
unfortunately the radiation being described in relation to the weak force is
not electromagnetic radiation, but rather radiation caused by nuclear
decay... most often beta decay where the nucleus emits an electron and
converts a neutron to a proton and an anti-neutrino. hmm, do anti-neutrinos
cancel out your magical levitating diamagnetic solar neutrinos?