Art Unwin wrote:

You are so dumb! Look at the center pole as being a vector in
opposition to the gravity vector. Then add the two tilted vectors
which represents the vectors of the Coriolis force.
(Yes, you add both of the vectors for Coriollis because it is a
rotational force) You are then left with a horizontal vector that
balances the above vectors. Thus you have horizontal polarization.
Why? Because the vectors outside the boundary are a combination of
two vectors which is gravity and the Coriolis. Now somebody mentioned
the question of polarization purity ! When you include the Coriolis
effect you get exactly that, a pure horizontal polarization which is
very useful in determining whether forces in shear conditions exist at
airports as views of reflection of transmissions are confusing if
you transfer a mixture in the first place. This way they have purity
in radiation so that reflections are more clearer for their
determinations as to what weather conditions exist and hopefully not
"wind shear" where a plane instantly loses altitude.
You are fortunate that you caught me before I left.

And I have to say, WHAT A LOAD OF RUBBISH!!

Give me the vectors for all forces involved. The description alone is
not acceptable. And none of your obfuscation BullSh t. Just do it,
otherwise I know you're lying, as usual.

It's not that I don't trust you, but I don't trust you.

tom
K0TAR