Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 14, 5:45 pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

Point to a law that I have violated of which you learned about in
academia.
As for me I am at peace with my offering and thus can move on until a
violation of law is presented.
then don't you dare go away until you explain how your weak and strong force
can have any effect on conduction band electrons when their range of effect
is confined to the nucleus.

And why not? You keep shooting from the hip on baseless statements.
For me I have supplied a trail for examination that I believe is in
complience of existing laws.
You were the first to state I was in error by applying a time varying
field to Gauss's law of Statics and the group followed your position
where no body provided academic proof.
Then Dr Davis came along and provided academic proof per its
legitimacy. Having a Doctorate from MIT and working for the Space
Agency gives him some what of a track record. I then found out that
one of the prolific antagonistic posters did not survive high school.
True, he was suspended, so it was not really his fault!
Obviously such things are not the norm in this group but it does give
you thought regarding a antagonistic track record when lacking in
independent thought shoots from the hip or extract a paragraph from a
book like a copy provided by a copying machine of which he has no
understanding.
Nope, I have provided details of my independent work all of which
follows the existing laws
of Classical physics. At this time I see it as a worthwhile theory
with merit and possibly more if there is no violation of existing
laws. If you have doubts then contact your alma
to provide consistency in your allegations. Or alternatively wait for
the PTO printing of my
present concluding patent request such that all details are available
for inspection.
This newsgroup is available for free speech but for the reader caution
is advised. Reverse your position on the Gaussian extension so we can
then continue the discussion.

So Art again fails to step up when asked to prove something.

"I'M RIGHT!!! PROVE ME WRONG!!!" is Art's continual wail. No Art, you
have to prove you are right, and just claiming it isn't even a start.

FRAUD == ART

tom
K0TAR