In article ,
~ RHF wrote:
On Sep 13, 2:37=A0pm, dxAce wrote:
Al Dykes wrote:
In article =
s.com,
Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Sep 12, 11:55=3DA0am, (Mark Zenier) wrote:
In article =
roups=3D
.com,

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

The commercial for the one at 8pm EST
is called "102 Minutes That Changed America", it gave me goosebumps=
,
unbelievable.

I remember that morning like it was yesterday and how this group ca=
me
alive, there was no bickering in here
that day....that's for sure.

Every 9-11 I google the threads from that
day and the following week to keep it fresh in my mind.

Be prepared for the next one is my motto.

The way to be prepared is to know the enemy and not live some delusi=
onal
myth that the US Media has created. =3DA0What does Al Quaida want? =
=3DA0We'll=3D
not
be told, because it would be inconvenient.

A personal question to all the group.

1. Did the TV coverage you watched show the people jumping from the
top of the towers? =3DA0

Disney News (ABC) didn't show that, I gather that Fox did. =3DA0(I f=
irst sa=3D
w
pictures in a copy of the New York Times that the neighbors had boug=
ht
the following morning). =3DA0My hypothesis is that seeing that in re=
al-time
had great effect on people's attitudes. =3DA0The emotional power of =
video..=3D
.

Mark, you're speaking to the choir here when you're
talking to me. I was just mentioning the show because it included
footage from angles never
shown before.

Make no mistake about it, if Alex Jones can be screaming on his show
two months before the "attacks" that he had intel that the WTC were
going to be hit....and still it happened. You don't
have to be too bright to figure the rest out IMO.

Jones never stated a date or method.

In the summer of 2001 it was obvious to anyone reading thenews that
some sort of an attack was comming.

It's well described in chapter 6 of the 9/11 Commission Report.

=A0http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

Clinton tried lots of things. For many reasons, many out of his
control, they didn't work. He *did* keep us safe during the attacks of
the millennium new year but we don't hear about them because they were
foiled. =A0Was he perfect? Far from it.

The Bush Administration just pushed reorganization memos until the
first scheduled terrorism meeting; Sept 4, 2001 Literally. They
ignored the nearly 50 threat warnings that the FBI knew of in their
branch offices as of the Summer of 2001 but the FBI had no national
analysis capability.

The Bush Administration never asked the various intelligence agencies
to combine efforts against a very real threat.

Couldn't. Remember, thanks to the Liberal assholes, the various agencies =
were not
allowed to share info.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

WHY DID 9/11 HAPPEN ?
One Man =3D Senator Frank Church (Idaho-Dem)
It was the Democrats lead by Frank Church that "Handicapped"
the US Intelligence Agencies that has resulted in many of our
Human Intelligence Failures that are still happening today.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...446cd97fd5b524

The Real Roots of 9/11 and the Problems in the US Intelligence
Services began in 1975. In 1975, Senator Frank Church (Idaho-Dem)
became the Chairman of the Select Committee to Study Governmental
Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. This committee
investigated alleged abuses of power by the Central Intelligence
Agency and the Federal Bureau of Intelligence.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...0e21f5329fa85a



Without denying that there were firewall problems, In the summer of
2001, teh FBI in it's brabch offies had all the information they
needed to disrupt the hijacking plot. FBI agents trid to get HQ
attention but the FBI culture was strictly about catching bank robbers
and kidnappings after the act.

See The Commission report (2004) and updated by Amy Zegert in _Spying
Blind: The CIA, the FBI, and the Origins of 9/11_ (2007)

The roots of our problems in the middle-east go back to 1953 when the
US overthrew a democratic government in Iran and put in a despot, the
Shah.








--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail