Spherical radiation pattern
Art Unwin wrote:
You are NOT an engineer. You are NOT a scientist. You may have been an
engineer in the past, but today, you are not showing that ability.
The pity is, you believe what you are doing. That is the only thing that can
be verified. (Verification comes from the fact you did submit a patent
application. That is the only thing that can be independently verified.) Art Unwin KB9MZ....XG(UK)
I don't know who you are or where you came from into this discussion
that has lasted for years. I did read a portion of what you stated but
you must recognize that this newsgroup
is like a magnet to those who want to sound off without revealing
themselves. It is called free speechand I know not where you fit in! I
am sorry I inadvertently came into your court room your honour. Joe
the judge I presume and not Joe the plumber
That is the best I can do for you until the patent office prints the
rest.
Then you can base all the above accusations that you made prior to the
facts
Years is a fallacy. You showed up with your fantasies quite recently,
not even 2 years ago, at least with the nonsense you currently spout.
If it's true, prove it.
You have gotten farther and farther from reality as time has passed. If
it's true, prove it.
You refuse to give proof for your claims. If it's true, prove it.
You refuse to refute proofs against your claims. If it's true, prove it.
You won't give us a design to test because you know none of them
actually work the way you claim. If it's true, prove it.
Your claims of diamagnetic levitating neutrinos and other nonsense has
nothing to do with reality. If it's true, prove it.
You are a FRAUD. Prove you are not.
And I will predict your answer, if you give one, will be equivalent to
"You need to prove I'm wrong".
tom
K0TAR
|