On Sep 15, 10:58*am, "christofire" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Sep 15, 10:24 am, "christofire" wrote:

"Art Unwin" wrote in message

- - snip - -

You still did not put a stake in the ground, just walked around the
question and then walked away. One more chance before I place you in
"unsure". Where in Maxwell's equations does it refer to "particles" or
do they have no place in his views on radiation?
What is your call sign or do you prefer to remain as a unknown?

Incorrect; I gave a positive answer to the question. *My answer was based on
normal physics and identified what must, therefore, be paraphysical or
nonsense (or both). *The equations don't make any reference to particles -
as I'm sure you are aware. *As to the views of Maxwell, the person, I
daresay you can make them up to your heart's content without provable
challenge.

I don't much care what category you place me in - you already know how I
categorise people who make up their own versions of physics and expect other
to believe them ... and sadly some appear to!

My call sign, if I have one, is none of your business.

Chris

O.k. So the thread as posted in the title is now closed. On the
question on the Gauss extension this is not understood so that is also
now closed. Insults? Well they can go on for ever as this is the main
attraction for its members.