Resaonance and minimum SWR
Walter Maxwell wrote in
:
My post below is not exactly on target for the thread, but I believe
useful. It's Sec 11.3 from Chapter 11 of Reflections, the whole of
which is available on my web page at www. w2du.com.
The title of the Sec is "A Reader Self-test and Minimum-SWR
Resistance."
Sec 11.3 A Reader Self-Test and Minimum-SWR Resistance
" Everyone knows that when a 50-ohm transmission line is terminated
with a pure resistance of 50 ohms, the magnitude of the reflection
coefficient,, rho , is 0, and the SWR is 1:1. Right? Of course!
Well, it for a distortionless 50 ohm line.
With
that in mind, here is a little exercise to test your intuitive skill.
If we insert a reactance of 50 ohm in series with the 50-ohm
resistance, the load becomes Z = 50 + j50. The SWR will be 2.618:1.
Now for the question. With this 50-ohm reactance in the load, is the
SWR already at its minimum value with the 50-ohm resistance, or will
some other value of resistance in the load reduce the SWR below
2.618:1? You say the SWR is already the lowest with the 50-ohm
resistance, because, after all, the line impedance, ZC, is 50 ohms?
Continuing on the distortionless example, if you visualise this on a
Smith chart, for any constant X and R independently variable, the value
of R for minimum VSWR will be such that the tangent to the reactance
circle is also a tangent to the VSWR circle at that point (R,X), and R
for minimum VSWR will always be greater than Ro for Xl0.
However, Zo for practical cables is not real, not quite.
Owen
|