Thread: Standing waves
View Single Post
  #43   Report Post  
Old September 22nd 09, 03:05 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Art Unwin Art Unwin is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default Standing waves

On Sep 21, 8:43*pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:

Chris you are being stupid as well as acting as a fool.
Acceleration of the particle only occurs while within the
electrostatic field. When it exits it has the speed of light because
it has emmerged from the intersecting two fields.and thus from *the


Nice job on the name calling, dingbat.


You do it all the time TOM , no reasons, just because!


So, which charged particle are you proposing is being accelerated here?
* There are none that have no mass, which would mean that no particle
capable of being accelerated by an electrostatic field could exit at
"the speed of light because it has emmerged from the intersecting two
fields".

You are talking garbage Tom in a attempt to sound educated.
When you introduce Newtons laws you are standing on the existence of
mass.
It was a particle with mass that broke the equilibrium of the Sun
which starts the whole cycle.
This mass is debris from the burning and release of energy from the
sun which ebbs and flows according to the 11 year sun spot cycle. It
is acknowledged that particles from the Universe are in the billions
per cubic meter in the Earths system and all these particles have
mass. The idea that neutrinos, a particle from the Sun had no mass was
dispelled years ago, so the Laws of Newton remains in place. This very
same action is shown with respect to a CRT where the particle which in
that case does not have spin. You will see that the particle is
accelerated within the borders of the electrostatic field which is
also intersected by a mgnetic field such that its path is parabolic
within the confines of the electrostatic field which becomes a
straight line travel without acelleration as it leaves the confines of
the electrostatic field. It is all quite simple Tom but you continue
to implant erronius data into the description as a basis to supply
insults.



Have you now discovered a new particle which has charge and no mass?


There you go again, all particles have mass and Newtons laws are still
in place
Stop playing the fool


tom
K0TAR