On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:13:33 +0200, Szczepan Bia?ek
wrote:

"Exactly" makes it very, very easy to show how an analogy fails:
Describe the laminar flow in terms of
the Reynolds number for
the interface between RF and a Biconical Antenna
and
the interface between RF and a thin wire Antenna."

We've already determined you don't know how to do this, and that you
don't have the vaguest idea.

My guess is that you don't even understand the few simple terms in the
quote above. Can you tell us what laminar means? How about
interface? Your response is wholly devoid of their discussion, so I
suppose you cannot except to quote someone else - unfortunately that
does not reveal knowledge.

If you cannot give us a Reynolds number (something like any mechanical
engineer like Art can do - well, yes, I admit that is an unwarranted
presumption on my part), then you may as well let your boat drift on.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC