"K7ITM" wrote
...
On Sep 17, 11:59 pm, Szczepan Bia³ek wrote:
"K7ITM"
...
....
reasonably simple terms. One of the best I know is Joseph Boyer's
pair of articles from May and June, I think it was, 1978 "Ham Radio"
magazine: "The Antenna-Transmission Line Analog." It's a non-
mathematical work; it will leave you with answers with not a lot to
back them up, but they do match what we observe, as far as I
understand it. I have these as a PDF, along with a fairly important
section from a book referenced by the articles.

You send me to library. ...

No, actually I told you that I have the article plus one of the
important references as a PDF [file]. It's certainly not worth my
effort or the net bandwidth for me to try to repeat what that article
has already done a good job with. Also, I gather from some of the
postings in this thread that you're more interested in arguing and
being negative than in reading such an article.

I have used "library" many times in my posts in meaning "read something". I
am here to collect the arguments that EM is useless. So I am interested only
in troubles in explanation of antennas behaviour. You should agree that now
we should analize the behaviour of electrons in antennas. The first antenna
(Hertz experiment) was made before discovery of electrons. But electronic
oscillators use electrons which travel in vacuume . They have the charge and
the mass. In antennas are the same.
S*