On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:59:03 -0700, N9NEO wrote:

On Oct 27, 7:29Â*am, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:
"dave" wrote in message

...


My personal belief is that health care goes along with that whole life,
liberty and pursuit of happiness thing. Â*Cars, education, and foreign
travel are perks, not rights. Homes... well, shelter is one of the
three basic needs to preserve life, but people have lived over the
centuries in open caves, straw huts, wooden shacks, frame houses,
igloos. People still live in the three latter, plus the occasional
cardboard box or bridge.. Were it up to me, all vacant buildings in
inner cities would be converted to indigent housing, with a requirement
for some form of recompense (community service, etc.) from those who
live there, and a legitimate effort thereby to better their own lot.
But then, I'm not likely to ever have my way.

Yes, exactly Brenda Ann. Lump in health care with that pursuit of
happiness clause. If it makes you happy to have health care then go out
and pursue a job that compensates well enough and pay for it yourself.
Don't take my hard earned money away from me in order to pay for your
gosh darn health care. You go to school and study hard and you will do
well. If a person is developmentally challenged then no problem, we all
chip in and take care of him/her. If the person ****ed off in school
and never studied then he gets what he deserves - no health care.

regards,
NEO

All is good for you until you get cancer and loose your job, house and
insurance. Then you will demand the government owes you something.

Or will you simply pack you grocery cart and leave willingly? I drought
that.