On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:52:12 -0800, RHF wrote:

On Nov 2, 2:21Â*am, Steve wrote:
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:29:35 -0600, "5265 Dead, 398 since 1/20/09"

wrote:
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:57:37 -0800, MagneticEnergy wrote:

What good are the numbers when they are distorted by government
spending programs? Â*Claims that $4500 car rebates cost taxpayers
$24K? Â*That's absurd. Â*Giving people $8K to buy a house, and that
costs taxpayers $46K? Â*With that kind of "social spending" you could
give away cars that cost less than $10K and liveable RV trailers
that don't require financing?

Those numbers are absurd, and I suspect someone pulled them out of
their ass.

- Actually, it was a study by Edmunds, - who seem to know plenty about
automobile sales...

He may know auto sales, but I came across one post today that showed he
didn't understand statistics. The three billion dollar program generated
some twenty billion in economic activity.

Add 'Edmunds' to the Obama-Enemies-List©

Oh, please. Don't be a crackpot.

Expanding & Redefining The Obama-Enemies-List©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e0ecd9724e72fc
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...d01be08e600eaa
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...6de831e7550495



They want to "bulldoze neighborhoods", erect solar and wind electric
generation plants in hurricane and other storm prone areas (it's
either hurricanes, tornadoes, or flooding?) Â*Coal and gas are the
most dependable forms of cheap energy, and they want us to go broke
trying to pay for it next year?

The neighborhoods in question are derelict and abandoned, a burden to
the cities they are in. Â*Why not replace hundreds of square miles of
rotting and empty tenements with parks, green industry areas, and
public transit? Â*As for coal and gas, they are killing us. Â*For all
the wet diaper contingent of the GOP whines about the cost, the cost
of global warming itself is going to be far greater.

But that is why Republicans and Democrats don't want Conservatives
in public office, they want to give their deep pocket campaign
finance donors big concessions, even if it wrecks the economy?

Pretty much, yeah. Â*"Conservative" is either a loon or an industry
whore. Â*Neither do us much good.

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit
the messages from this private computer, which you may observe at
your own risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party
related to transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the
material involved, including email correspondence, which is not
necessary to the function of the website, and may or may not be
archived. No personal information exchanged will be shared without
your consent, or provided to third parties with out the express
permission of the parties and, or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it
in various known or unknown electronic methods do not give
permission to any third parties to share or provide private personal
information who may operate as part of the internet communications
system, including all parties, who may technically intercept
communications due to the nature of network conditions beyond both
the author's legal and physical control, unless those communications
represent violations of the law, upon which the author, and or web
site will cooperate to pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not
contain factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody.
The views may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt
being called a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to
typographical, grammer, or other technical communication problems
not realized or imagined, or the possibility of views based on false
or missing information, or with the intention of being used for
entertainment purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on
the actions, character, or reputation of an organization,
individual, or groups of individuals, with the intent of
communicating with a limited group of people, and not the general
public, however no distribution restrictions apply for fair use
purposes described by the US Copyright Office, if no other
restrictions are present or communicated, with all commercial
proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to remain
the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are
proven to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit,
disparage or demean any person or entities in any professional or
personal manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion
of the author, for which it is expected that you read at your own
risk, with no liability held to the author or any third parties who
may store, transfer, or forward this message to others, in the
traditions of free speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in
a society that believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals
having sex, and other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or
that the use of abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races
from "spreading the wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which
the author does not condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not
be a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed bywww.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by
the author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related
links, that may be provided for all or any of the following known or
unknown purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational,
and for the purpose of giving copy right credit referal information
under the terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair
use" regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair"
and not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers
are assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law
provides that you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are
in fact demonstrations that there are current members of Congress
that neither understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers
made for the United States of America, or understand how they work
in the opinion of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially
in light of anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes
relating to energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers
to comply with the law and manage the environment, and in light that
there are various consumer protection agencies, including the Better
Business Bureau, which has free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially
infinite number or forms of electronic communication, as such the
author will retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of
previous communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows,
in order to properly convey the intention of the author and to
demonstrate an enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not
enthusiastically pursue getting high on cocaine as often as possible
as Barack Hussein Obama has admitted in his book (paraphrase,
synopsis), according to (mmm, mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson
Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a
Chicken Chaser!

--

Contrary to what liberals are whining, nobody owes you anything.