View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old November 6th 09, 07:49 AM posted to alt.internet.wireless,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
who where who where is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
Default Matching impedance with coax

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:24:44 -0800, Richard Clark
wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:20:32 -0600, tom wrote:

I do have 2 feet.


But not one of them in Perth.


No relation to anyone you are thinking_of/describing/etc, sorry to
ruin your conspiracy theory.

If you want to try and achieve a match to 50 ohms by moving the
adjacent parasitic elements seriously close to the driven folded
dipole, go for it. (I could dust off trusty Elnec and get a result.)
But I'd be surprised if anyone who gives a rats about the consistency
of the result would go down that path.

I am very familair with how the commercial side-mounted dipoles and
yagis are manufactured here in Australia, and I doubt that the rest of
the world is dramatically different. In three simple words - series
coax transformer. Let's agree that with an SMD you don't have
parasitics to play around with - except for tower spacing (which has
an impact on pattern, and variations are used for that end.) The
Aussie manufacturers use eaxactly the same method on the FD on their
yagis. That is why I suggested the O/P look into that approach.