dave wrote:
Poetic Justice wrote:
John Galt wrote:
dxAce wrote:
dave wrote:

What story is that? Do you believe that government has, as its
objective, to dictate the incomes of its citizens?

I'd disagree. That's more of a Soviet notion than one to be found
in a
free society. Are you a communist?

JG

I am an socialist libertarian.
And, a drug addled 'tard boy!


Precisely what I was thinking.

JG


He's trying to be cute..... so he used an oxymoron.


Socialism is 180 degrees out of phase with Libertarians. Both Socially
and economically.



Wrong, Bucko.

...In almost every case, the socialist movement has been divided along
authoritarian, and libertarian lines. The anarchists on the libertarian
side, and the Jacobins, Marxists, Leninists, Stalinists, and reformist
state-socialists on the authoritarian side. (And liberals more or less
split down the middle.)...

2 dimensional political models are too simplistic to capture the
nuances. I can see that it would be attractive to those who need to boil
the world down into simplistic chunks, but that's not how it works.

Much better is this view, which does show the correct relationship
between libertarians and anarchists (which is sharing only a distrust of
goverment and no other motivations).

http://www.baen.com/chapters/axes.htm

Or this:

http://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2

JG






http://flag.blackened.net/liberty/libsoc.html