On Nov 15, 10:42*pm, Art Unwin wrote:


Was it the arabs that expanded the term to equilibrium
that could accompany the use of boundary laws?

Lurch imitation.. ugggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh......




Again, it's not my place to find your errors. *It's your place to
prove and demonstrate your allegations.

That cannot be done when others rely on theories because they are seen
written in a book. It takes corroberation with existing laws to supply
a modicom of science teachings *where those agreements can then be
built upon. This is a repeat of the battles of faith versus the
observations and deductions provided by science.

It could be done quite easily. All you have to do is build the
antenna, and then compare it with known benchmarks.
But of course, that would be using common sense. :/
It would also prove your theories are flawed, which is why
you won't do this in public, if at all.



At the same time opponents will bring forwards Toms adage W8TI, that
for maximum efficiency a radiator must be straight, thus leaving him
with the onus of showing that Steven Best efforts were all wrong by
the use of the soon to be corrected theory corrections
before old theories are fully discounted where all may read it for
themselves in *a book.

#1, it's W8JI, not W8TI, and what he said was correct. You are just
taking what he said out of context and are distorting it to fit your
agenda. If you have a straight radiator of a certain length, yes, the
most efficient configuration will be a straight line.
If you take this same length of wire and mangle it into various
bends, twists and turns, loss will rear it's ugly head.
Deal with it. There is no free lunch.


Dr Best didn't seem to mention anything about the design being any
more efficient than a larger antenna. *He had a design requirement to
fit an antenna inside a 0.04 wavelength diameter ball, and optimized
his design around that requirement. *Getting 1.6dBi of gain out such a
small antenna is impressive.

Yes, but more important was the ability to stuff wavelengths of
radiator showing past erronius suggestion that a radiator must be
straight.On top of that he attained a hemisperical radiation pattern
that this group stated was impoissible. Thus another false old wives
tale was debunked, By the way the paper in no way suggested a
"electrically" small antenna, *only a "physically" smaller antenna, so
you need to re read the paper.

Ugh.. 1.6dbi gain is still less than a straight dipole.. There is no
free lunch when you use linear loading. Which BTW, is a technique
as old as dirt.. :/
Just because someone decides to call it a fancy name such as
"fractal", does not impart magic qualities to this old as dirt
technique.
BTW, it's quite possible one will need a matching device with such an
antenna. Even more loss.
If you don't require matching for this wonder of technology, I'd
suspect you probably have re-invented the dummy load.

But maybe that's a moot point, being as you have ignored others
that point out the same thing over and over again.
IE: all radiators are quite capable of radiating nearly all power
that is applied to them. It's getting the power to them without
it turning to heat which is the real trick. Good luck in the contest.
You are going to need it.


Phew, that was a long questionaire but as always my life and thoughts
is an open book.

I thought you had a problem with books? According to you, books
corrupt the mind. Does that mean we would be best off to ignore
everything you write?

I hope the above satisfies your needs!

I doubt it was as good for him as it was for you. You just seem
to lay there. :/