On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:08:09 -0500, Michael Coslo
wrote:

I dunno. Not to call Richard or yourself incorrect, but it could just be
a language problem coupled with a short fuse.

Hi Mike,

The best evidence is from his postings. If there is a language
difficulty (we've been assaulted with paisano fruit seller dialect
from Italy when this is obviously Hollywood cliché) then Ronald's
re-characterizations expressed in understood English are not
miscomprehensions of language.

Ronold: "A dummy load is an LC circuit."

anyone else: "A dummy load is NOT an LC circuit."

Such an interchange is more seriously logic limited if
"misunderstood." I think Google translate would cope easily here.
Negating the original phrase does not lead to the sophism of doctors
and farmers - trolling does.

If you want to be gracious, we have a Belgian CBer who is trying to
work 40M. That level of technical ability is NOT masked by
translation.

Reminds me of the dwarf's argument in the movie "In Bruges."

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC