Thread: Slinkey Antenna
View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 09, 11:21 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
ecregger ecregger is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 10
Default Slinkey Antenna


wrote in message
...
On Dec 2, 9:52 am, "Wayne" wrote:
If the receiver
noise increases when you hook up the antenna, then you aren't doing too
badly.
--Wayne


In a case like that, he's doing about as well as one can do, not
counting changes in pattern. For SWL, a slinky is ok. Not so hot
for transmitting though, being the antenna is almost all loading coil
with no capacitance added at the ends. Kind of like running back
to back ham sticks with no stingers on the ends. :/
It'll work, but there are better designs for short loaded dipoles.


Speaking of compromise antennas that work - at least somewhat - there is one
that MFJ has been selling for quite a while. Unfortunately, the model number
does not spring to mind, but it is for indoor use and consists of a remote
control box (remote from the "antenna") an over twenty foot run of coax and
a mobile looking telescopic element antenna on a mount of some kind (I
forget which type). It does work pretty well. A friend of mine owned one and
he lived in an apartment complex with a no external antenna rule. He did a
very good job of working out past the Mississippi on 40 meters with just 100
watts. He lived in New Jersey.

Ed, NM2K (yes NM5K it is me again. I got my old callsign back)