On Dec 3, 6:52*pm, K7ITM wrote:
On Dec 3, 12:25*am, Lostgallifreyan wrote:

( *Richard Feynman lectures)

... I don't know if he's written anything a layman can easily work
through, that doesn't come with lots of maths without which accompanying text
doesn't help much, but if he has I'll try to read it.

I think one of the key things that made his physics lectures popular
is that they were delivered without a whole lot of math. *You could
get into that if you wanted, but you could also get a lot out of just
listening to the _ideas_.

If you drop me an email, perhaps I can send you a bit more about this
particular lecture...

Cheers,
Tom

That is oh so true! The masters started with an observation of an
occurence and not from
a rendering of mathematics. With more observations it became natural
to align the Universe via mathematics which, as with a jig saw puzzle,
fits together nicely.,
It would seem today that scientists today are using mathematics via a
computer to churn out bundles of equations leaving the operator to
think of an observation that would fit the math. Of course,
mathematics provide imaginary answers similar to a quadratic equation
that finish up as multiple of false leads and deductions which
eventually requires the multiple use of constants to provide a
semblance of understanding of what has been provided.