On Dec 16, 3:22*am, Editor RadioTalkingPoints
wrote:
Wonderfully written and speaks what a lot of us are thinking.

The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the
right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your
own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who
may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer)
for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole
or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the
entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you
apparently want to live in an imaginary world.

In my view, health care is not a right and never will be, it is only a
luxury afforded by a prosperous economy that is willing to provide
charity for the indigent, if not out of guilt of conscience for its
lack of decent paying minimum wages, then out of the principals of
helping the poor and the old by the younger and the stronger as
required by a higher power who delegates such responsibilities to
ourselves. *

If health care is not a right, then neither is life. Without health,
there is no life. And if everyone had health care as a right, then no
one would need to feel to act out of a guilt of conscience in or out
of any principles of helping the poor. It's not the economy that
feels guilt or has principles, it's people, and this idiot writer is
trying to make it sound like the economy is some kind of thinking,
breathing, living person that generously bestows health care on those
who can't afford it. The economy does what it does, it doesn't care
about coming to anyone's rescue; in fact, it just doesn't care about
anything, it only does what it does.

And then this idiot writer goes on to talk about a higher power
delegating such caring responsibilities to ourselves to do the right
thing for the poor. Well, which is it? The economy being responsible
in doing the right thing out guilt or principles or "ourselves"? And
who is this higher power and has this higher power ever been seen by
anyone and when did he do this delegating?

It's funny how some people hate the idea of people in general
acquiring a new right. What's the big deal? It's just a right. Like
a right to a lawyer, a right to vote, a right to practice your faith.
If any right should be stripped away, it's the one to practice your
faith. Which is more important, praying to your own version of an
invisible entity that in all likelihood doesn't even exist in any
realm, and which quite frankly would have you declared legally insane
in a saner world than this one is, or getting a cure for some cancer
resulting in continuing to enjoy the right to life without ending up
broke and homeless in the process?

The rest that was written by this idiot writer is pure idiocy and has
been snipped to prevent irreversible brain damage to unsuspecting
people.