On 12/18/09 14:29 , fdgdfgfdg wrote:
If you'd like to actually address my point, we can return to something
that begins to resemble a discussion, again.

I addressed your point. You just weren't happy with the way they were
addressed.


No, actually you deleted the point.

If I deleted it, it was a point that I didn't feel needed addressing.


It was the point of the conversation. You deleted it and took the
conversation way from IBOC and made it about AM Stereo. I made a an
AM stereo reference as a comparartive. My point was about IBOC. You
deleted it. And addressed items that weren't being argued.




Then why are you responding. Oh, that's right! Your Maus...who has to get
in the last word and argue insigniifcant things ad nauseum....


Yeah....I"m the problem. You were so attentive to details you
failed to miss that I was actually on your side of the issue. Go
back and re-read. When you get to my actual point, let me know.