On 12/19/09 24:26 , fdgdfgfdg wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in message
...
On 12/18/09 14:29 , fdgdfgfdg wrote:
If you'd like to actually address my point, we can return to something
that begins to resemble a discussion, again.

I addressed your point. You just weren't happy with the way they were
addressed.


No, actually you deleted the point.

If I deleted it, it was a point that I didn't feel needed addressing.


It was the point of the conversation. You deleted it and took the
conversation way from IBOC and made it about AM Stereo. I made a an AM
stereo reference as a comparartive. My point was about IBOC. You deleted
it. And addressed items that weren't being argued.

Then I made my points. Why do you keep responding. (Oh, I know...your are
trying to find a way to keep this thread going...)

Then why are you responding. Oh, that's right! Your Maus...who has to
get
in the last word and argue insigniifcant things ad nauseum....


Yeah....I"m the problem. You were so attentive to details you failed to
miss that I was actually on your side of the issue.

Again, then why are you responding.

When you get to my actual point, let me know.

I dont care about your actual point.




And THAT, my dear boy is the real point of your message.

Thank you.

And have a Merry Christmas.


D. Peter Maus