The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the
right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your
own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who
may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer)
for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole
or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the
entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you
apparently want to live in an imaginary world.


Interesting flood of cheap books circulating around, full of socialist
garbage being taught in US colleges today? Consumerism?
Advertising? Warping the mentality of readers by suggesting that
consumerism is advertised driven product buying manipulation processes
rather than inventors creating products that people want or need and
using successful advertising techniques? And that book was one of the
ones that did not appear to be obviously subversive physcho babble?

But of course highly trained government operatives in the FCC will
never suggest to their superiors that perhaps the suggestion that the
art of "consumerism" is simply a warped idea planted by socialist or
communist agents designed to sow the seeds of economic chaos? Or am I
talking over the head of Professor Obama right now?

And what about those who rant about "corporatism" by pointing out the
few bad apples, and ignoring discussions that could add several
chapters to a book discussing the benefits and advantages of
successfully run companies? No, those books only focus on such topics
as "greed" and then go into rampant, incoherent discussions (its
easier to fool skulls of mush) about morality by simply recycling the
talking points of controversial, unprovable, and even partial
psychoanalytical discussions that attempt to "discover" to the reader
"new" ideas when the fact of the matter is a simple failure of a
single or group of individuals and the concept of the structure of
corporatism itself (and of course no details of alternatives, only
negatives?)?

And of course those that demonize corporatism, and cherish media
control, also fail to point out the flaws of giving the government
control of both structures and the media? How do corporations get
sued or stopped from unethical behavior? The media? And what happens
when the media ignores government grabs of power?

And at what point are you a tax payer, when you are loosing more than
a day every week lost to government taxes, and a slave to the
government, is there a magic ratio? Is it two days, is it effectively
3 days? Or is it when your discretionary income evaporates?

If I am working more than over 8 hours a week for the government, I
consider myself a slave, and simply ask the government to reduce its
spending. There is no reason in this era of modern internet that
groups can not raise money to do things on their own and not harrass
the dozen or so of Congressional Staff members? 8 hours of a 40 hour
week is what percent? I don't mind giving, but let me give, don't
take it from me? Do I want to fill out a form everytime I need
something? And why are there so many check boxes for "credits" on
tax forms?

How about no more death taxes? How about prohibiting retro-active
taxes? How about limiting the page length of bills? How about
discussing the bills honestly? How about firing communists in the
media? How about an end to "pork projects"? How about the media stop
asking about the government creating jobs, and interviewing business
owners non stop about how they can't create business plans by guessing
what is going to happen next?

You see Speaker Pelosi, when you jet around on a Gulf Stream Jet,
instead of flying commercial, you are a dream killer. Maybe it was
one American's dream next year of buying a couple pairs of nice blue
jeans. Maybe it was another American's dream next year to paint their
house. But of course when you ride around in limos all the time, and
see nothing but $5000 evening wear and Hollywood actors, perhaps you
snobs have forgotten what being American is all about? Rush has
gotten his wish, the Democrats have failed.

Why not outlaw health insurance, and make it health credit plans,
instead? What incentive do you have to stop smoking, etc., unless you
are not part of a lottery system and have to pay for it yourself? And
why should the medical industry price things that we can afford when
they can hide the costs by not requiring patients to be able to afford
the treatments over time through credit programs? Does your credit
score go up after you pay your health insurance premiums for years?
Credit spurs investment in the health industry, government welfare
spurs rationing?

Why not outlaw employers from recruitment practices that check the job
applicant's credit history? If Sally leaves Joe, and rips him off,
and Joe owes me money, I want Joe to get another job after he gets
fired because of the drunken chaos he goes through in his personal
life tragedy (one example of many)? Wanted: Editors that can read in
society?

D = Democrats as in Dream Killers?

Happy New Year!