On Jan 10, 5:08*am, jaroslav lipka wrote:
On Jan 10, 11:58*am, tom wrot

* He has never designed, never built, and never tested anything that
performs like his claims. *

Tom

* * As you are so fond of saying, "you made the claim, you prove it",
or is you claim as empty as you head.

Jaro

He head not empty. The truth in he claim is quite obvious for all
to see. If old man Unwin had an antenna that actually performed
with even half the gusto of his claims, he would not have to resort
to pseudo science mumbo gumbo in order to try to convince people
that he has.
In fact, he wouldn't really have to explain a thing. He could just
mount it on a pike and let it do the talking.
But it's hard to claim radiation efficiency of 100% when you
are using a contra wound dummy load. He might beat out
Mike's light bulb dummy load, but by only a slim margin.
My calculations show that any minor increase over the
efficiency of a coax fed light bulb are not sufficient to cause
the delusions of grandeur which seem to possess Unwin.

So what say Jaroslav, o man o vision.. Can *you* prove that Art
has designed, built and tested any miracle whip that performs
as he claims?
Hold my breath not, sayeth Yoda.. Chortle..