RadioBanter - View Single Post

D. Peter Maus

On 1/26/10 18:11 , wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:30:10 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

On 1/26/10 13:59 , wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:00:25 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

Because "we" say so

Some logic, there, Bubba.

Glad you think so---it's worked very well for a couple of centuries

Not the way you do it, no.

Your premises are gratuitously based in the fundament that 'there
are no enemies on the Left, and that there is no honor on the Right.'

Gratuitously denied.

That's also worked for a couple of centuries.

The notion that you can simply plunder private wealth under the
brand of 'fair share of expenses for running the society' flatly
denies that the private wealth is already taxed at a dramatically,
confiscatorily, higher rate

So-how many millionaires went broke because of taxation?

The same number of poor people that got rich because of taxation.

That they don't go broke is not the issue. They're paying for all
the services used by people who do not pay taxes. So it's not about
funding the society, it's about confiscation so those who don't want
to earn for themselves don't have to.

If you're going to tax income, and claim 'fair share' then tax
all income.

Seems that conservatives and loonytarians keep ****ing it up.

Yes, because, as we all know, only Conservatives can do wrong.