Thread: RG6 and RG59
View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Old January 31st 10, 05:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Geoffrey S. Mendelson[_2_] Geoffrey S. Mendelson[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 115
Default RG6 and RG59

Lostgallifreyan wrote:
I found an RG6 with copper braid, to take care of that. Cheap too, but only
if it works. If it doesn't it will be cheaper to go for better cable to start
with. I like that BT2002 with the double copper braid, but I'm not yet sure
if the difference justifies the cost, though judging by what some places
charge for RG6 it probably does..


There also is the question of cost and availablity. I can go to Home Center
and buy for about $.50 a meter a decent quality RG6 quad shield. In other
places, you should be able to localy source it for less.

Radio type coax requires me to special order it at the local electronics
store, and it will be a lot more expensive and less likely to be what
I wanted.

I really do miss being in the US able to go into any one of 6 Radio
Shack stores near my home and buy RG8x (really just improved RG-58) or
RG-8 coax by the foot. It wasn't the best one could buy, it it was "good
enough".

I can only guess you situation, but if you can do it, I would just go
to a supplier you trust and buy RG6 and see if it works. While I'm sure if
you had the right equipment you could find differences in the noise that
comes through various RG6 versions, it may not be enough to matter.

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM
New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or
understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation.
i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia.