Looks Like FAUX Snews thought you should not see this
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:24:56 +0000 (UTC), Ima wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:19:29 -0800, Chi-Town Commie wrote:
Obamista Ima wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:54:31 -0600, Morton Davis wrote:
"Ima" wrote in message
...
So... Though the GOP demanded camera coverage of the Obama/GOP
conference, FAUX Snews could not stand that
What? That Obama was called out on nearly every one of his lies? From
his promise to broadcast the healthcare discussions on CSPAN to his
lying about Republicans having no ideas. Dip**** Obama tried to lock
them out and he got burned in Mass.. Now he's backpedaling and
claiming to want to work with them. He's way out of his league.
Please provide proof from mainline media please. There has been no
lockout of the GOP, nothing in the same sense as the dems could claim
they were locked out of this GOP meeting. CSPAN is not presidentialy
controlled so he is unable to force them to cover anything. If he did,
the wingnuts would claim he was controlling the media!
You're so delusional.
. Congress chose to
show Obama to be a liar.
heh public opinion shows that Congress (and in this case, the GOP) were
made to look pretty silly. Most of them did not even seem to know what
was in THEIR health proposal... as unrealistic and unimplementable as it
was.
Who laughed? Keith Dopeymann, Chrissy Matthews or Rachel Madcow? Or was
it the Three Stooges on CNN, Carville, Begala and that effeminate
Anderson Cooper. The public wasn't laughing in New Jersey, Virginia and
Massachusetts elections last year. In fact, they sent a message to the
Demoncrats
Massachusetts was the only turnover that is of concern while the rest
have always been "red" states.
NJ is a "red state"? Hah!
|