Thread: Why 50 ohms?
View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old February 14th 10, 12:24 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Geoffrey S. Mendelson[_2_] Geoffrey S. Mendelson[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 115
Default Why 50 ohms?

phaedrus wrote:

So the obvious question is: why are transmitters normalised to 50 ohms
when clearly 450 ohms would enable us to enjoy cheaper, do-it-
yourself, lower loss feeders? Was this some oversight at the time, or
good practice for some obscure reason that I simply cannot think of?



One story is that when radar was first developed coaxial feed lines were
made by buying copper pipe at the local plumbing supply and the
impedance resulting from using two standard sizes (one as the center
conductor and one as the shield was 50 ohms.

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM
New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or
understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation.
i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia.