On Feb 26, 10:59*am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:45:09 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 24, 9:24 pm, Art Unwin wrote:

Hopefully you will supply technical details and not just wordy fluff.

Talk about spray painting the kettle flat black... *:/

Is Art straining to come to terms with gain comparisons?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Patent number 1 on my page has now been approved . If there
is anything there then my grandchildren will benefit.
If there isn't you can visit my grave and say "I told you so."
Now I await the 2nd request to go thru.
Yes anybody can get a patent and yes you knew all about
that years ago and couldn't be bothered. And yes it doesn't prove
anything
at least at this point. So I have saved you from having to post. The
other spammers can now go right aheadand show who and what they really
are and add to their profiles.
Look up patent number 2 on my page and start storing ammunition ready
to throw my way.
With respect to gain comparison, what I am providing is sensitivity to
all polarizations thrown at the antenna instead of concentrating on
horizontal alone and neglecting receipt of all others. Gain is just
one measurement but it is nice if you can hear what others neglect
or not sensitive to or cannot hear. If you want to see a model of the
arrays in number 2 I can supply.