On Feb 27, 12:33*am, JIMMIE wrote:
On Feb 26, 11:08*pm, Art Unwin wrote:



I made a time varying field addition to a static field in equilibrium
some time back. All on this group said it was and still is B.S.!
*It was this finding that created the basis of a new antenna science
that I have shared with this group and with page Unwin antennas.
If one goes to
* * * * * * * * * * * * *http://www.james-clerk-maxwell.com/

one can read in better in *detail a description of my findings in a
much better way than I can fully explain where a mathematical error
existed when changing from MKS units 150 years ago when utelizing the
laws of statics in antenna design.
My findings *are in the patents loosely described on my page
*Unwin antennas!
The author of the paper goes on to say how this error has placed
physics back to the middle ages or something like that and for my self
I have the feeling that this error was the sole reason for Einstein
not solving the Standard model before he gave up and moved on to start
the idea of Quantum physics. For myself I am very comfortable with the
idea that communication is by the "particle" as a carrier of the
charge and not the often much quoted "wave." In addition I would point
out that the array I gave in another thread is further proof of the
correctness of what I have stated which is according to Maxwells
equations where accountability
is made of all forces. All antenna text books as well as those in
physics will now have to be updated to reflect the above findings
I am so pleased that I have been found not guilty of spreading B.S. in
the amateur radio community and thus exposing spammers for what they
really are. In summation it is now possible to make antennas in a
smaller volume such that a radiator for top band can now be placed
upon a tower or in a small garden as envisaged by Mr Moxon who has
since become a SK.
Regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg (uk)

Yep the mesh antenna is pure BS. In efficient antennas the DC
resistance of the antenna is usually quite small, values in the
1/100ths or 1/1000th of ohms would be expected. Normally the RF
impedance of the antenna is hundreds or thousands of times greater
than this. Under these conditions most of the power is going to be
radiated and only a small part radiated as heat. In the case of the
mess antenna the feed point impedance of the antenna is what you would
expect the DC resistance to be( around 1/100th of an ohm) . This means
most of your power is going to be used to heat wire. Congratulation
Art, you have made another Dummy Load.

Jimmie

No Jimmie, the function of a Faraday shield is not the same as a wire
antenna. It's function is to cancel the arriving fields to obtain the
time varing current which is the product of same
so it can be used by a radio. There are plenty of descriptions on the
web showing how the fields are separated and then cancelled by the
movement of charge which in turn generates the current that the radio
can use. The movement to cancel each other is an accelleration of
charge which is the prime mover of communication.