On Mar 1, 2:45*pm, (Dave Platt) wrote:
In article ,
Michael Coslo wrote:

Do you really think green is a primary color, you great braying
jackass?

That he may be, but Green is one of the three primary colors. At least
in additive color mode Red Blue Green. If you are talking about
subtractive color, it is Cyan Magenta Yellow. Add black and it becomes
the standard printing system.

True, but the "primariness" of the colors in these various color
systems are far from universal. *These colors are "primary" only with
regard to the visual systems of human beings (and some other primates)
which have a particular type of three-pigment visual receptor system.

Animals which have significantly different visual pigments in their
optic receptors (and there are many!) would tend to have a different
response than humans to various mixtures of red, green, and blue
light... e.g. the "red light plus green light equals a yellow color"
mixing trick would not necessarily work for them, as this is a
perceptual "trick" of the human visual system. *Although human eyes
may not be able to distinguish between a red/green mix, and a true
narrow-band yellow, a spectrograph (or a simple prism!) will
demonstrate that they're very different!

If Art is actually claiming that there's some sort of binding or
correspondence between the three families of leptons, and the "three
primary colors" as seen by humans, then the only such correspondence
I'm aware of is that both have the number "three" associated with
them. *There's no physical correspondence deeper than that, to the
best of my knowledge.

--
Dave Platt * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AE6EO
Friends of Jade Warrior home page: *http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
* I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
* * *boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!

David I am not ruling it out since I cannot personally state there is
a lepton for every color or hue. What I am deducing that particles
arrive on earth in the millions per cubic metre serching for a place
to rest on earth recognising at the same time the connection between
light(colour and particles) W#e see evidence of this every day where
they seek a diamagnetic surface one of which is water where they form
a skin on the surface and where this surface can be transformed by the
addition of soap. The whole discussion is really about the standard
model which became visual to me when I added a time vary field to a
boundary containing static particles. I was unaware at that point of
the huge disagreements in physics about the errors of maxwell. Either
way the only avenue I had to pursue my thinking was to assume that
programmers had kept faithfully to Maxwells equations alone. When I
got hold of an optimizer I operated it with toally disconnected
figures so that I could not be accused of propelling an answer that I
would like., The results are on my page showing clearly the
requirement of equilibrium. I am not considered a skilled programmer
and I am unable to fathom the truth of my program. As always I went to
an academic out of state who was familiar with antennas and physics
for verification by using other alternative programs where he
confirmed my findings. Whether my attempt at the standard model may be
worthless the arrays that I was lead to were new ,correct and probably
of some use. They in no way represent an effort to disprove the
duallity theorem
because that doesn"t state that the particle in question doesn't
change form ,only that they have similar properties. Yes there are
spammers attacking me but as yet nobody has proved that my deductions
are not correct. I don't listen to spammers but I do listen to those
who have a modicom of interest into how radiation works since the true
answers are not in any of the books.On the subject of the word "soot"
being rediculled it becomes obvious that the spammer is quite old,
possibly a redneck who lived in his early days where coal supplied the
heat. The word "soot" is certainly not confined to coal burning which
can be affirmed in many places.
Finally I am amazed that billions are still being spent at Cern when
there is so much division on the question of particles and waves and
where the divisions between physicists
that have been unable to open discussion, where the physics leadership
has declared it to be frozen to further discussion. Again a error in a
check book does not correct itself overtime! An error stays an error
until it is recognised and action taken.
If a formula is correct when using CGS units there is absolutely no
good reason that formulas derived using standard units should not
amount to the same conclusions thus forcing professors to take their
heads out of the sand.
Best regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......xg