A static field made dynamic to make Maxwell applicable
On Mar 4, 10:20*am, Art Unwin wrote:
This time I will respond to your silliness. I will try to put it as
simply as possible as you have stated your highest achievement was
junior high school after which you stumbled and thus did not go any
further.
A whiny bitchette like you has no idea what I've done or not done
since junior high school.
So screw you and the hobby horse you rode in on Mr. Unwin.
He showed mathematically that I was correct.
Don't make me have to whip out the archives.. again...
I have nev er claimed magical properties. When the cgs system is
applied to modern days antenna designs the results show higher
efficiencies in being sensitive to ALL SIGNALS
that arrive and where the same array needs a smaller volume than the
yag and is not limited to a single polarity signal. *In other words
the computer programs are now proven to follow the laws of Maxwell
where all forces are accounted for.
Well, may the forces be with you... chortle..
This has certainly been the case for many frauds foisted onto the ham
community but it is not applicable to all arrays that differ from the
Yagi and it is not applicablke in this case according to the accepted
NEC programs
Damn Art, for such an educated *******, you spell like a 4th
grader with the stomach flu...
It would be great if they were as I would have a piece of that cake
but I have not taken on any commercial deals.
I wouldn't be hold that bad breath if I were you..
There has been some uses of swept back radiators in the
past, but not quite the same thing as Art proposes.
And they do not try to proclaim they break or ignore the
rules of science.
Tis not I who is breaking the rules of science but academia in
Universities and schools!
Of course... :/ Everyone has crap for brains, except Art..
I and the others on the group would love to see a model of your
sampling so this whole question of whether the NEC programs are in
error as well as my judgement.
If you weren't such a whiny horses ass I might. But since you
are, bite me. I'm not going to do any work for you.
As an engineer I passed well beyond the point of junior high school so
I take your limited education for what it is and try to decifer what
you really mean. But you are so far off with your deductions that I
can only assume the true reasons for your postings is insult and spam
where the true use of this forum is to educate one self regarding
amateur antennas.
Some may not agree with that format but free speech always rules.
Well, excuse the hell out of me. But until you build and
test one of these conglomerations against other known
standards, I'll take it that your vast education was a waste of
time and money. Your blithering rants an education of things RF?
Give me a break, you silly old man..
|