On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:32:16 -0500, Joe from Kokomo
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:

Sorry dumb****
What was that comment of yours about personal attacks?

That was an observation. Your ignorance is understandable..if you are
defending him, you must be a Leftwinger and as such...shrug

..he [Bush] is out of office. The effects he may..may have had on
the nation are over.
Oh?

W's effects on the nation are over?

Gunner Asch wrote:

Which effects are you talking about?
Please tell me when the phony Iraq war ended.

Which "phony" war are you talking about?
Please tell me when the phony Afghanistan war ended.

Which "phony" war are you talking about?

Please don't be so disingenuous.

1) Both wars are still going, costing American lives and dollars. They
started on Bush's watch and DISPROVE your contention that the country is
no longer feeling the effects of Bush.

2) I call it "phony" because Bush and Cheney themselves BOTH said "No
WMDs, no connection to 9/11". So the questions beg to be asked; "Why are
we there? Why have 4000 American kids died (and more horribly maimed),
almost a TRILLION dollars spent." For what? If that doesn't define
"phony", I don't know what does.

Please tell me when the economic recession/Depression ended.

Gunner Asch wrote:

So you blame that on Bush? You seem to forget that he had Democrats
running Congress for the two years prior to the end of his watch....and
its Democrats that spend money, make laws, do bailouts and so forth.

1) Well, the Republican Wall Street Journal says the financial mess
started 4Q '07 - 1Q '08, squarely on Bush's watch.

2) Yes, the Democrats were there for two years, but that means the
Repubs were there for SIX years. 6 is a bigger number than 2. Check your
calculator.

3) Dems for two years or not, Bush still had veto power. It's odd we
didn't see him use it.