On Mar 23, 10:26*am, Art Unwin wrote:
On Mar 23, 4:29*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:



*"Bill" ...
On Mar 23, 1:24 am, "Joel Koltner"
wrote:

I know that many people think G3LHZ is a little bit off his rocker, but
out of
curiosity... what he suggests on slide 15
hehttp://frrl.files.wordpress.com/2009...ts-of-small-an...
If Art Unwin could read and comprehend slides 2, 3 and 4 it would

benefit everyone on this newsgroup.

You should read and understand the slide 10:

". "All truth passes through three stages:
- First it is ridiculed,

- Second it is violently opposed,

- Third it is accepted as being self-evident"."

S*

Very interesting article. Ofcourse I have only scanned it to get the
gist and will have to get a print out to study in depth.
It would appear that the subject is thermo dynamics and the transfer
of energty.
Popular thinkinking is that heat is created by the rapid occilations
of the constituent atoms
and thus one would expect that the constituent atoms would creat heat
which would be retained. My posture is that particles come and go and
where the energy or heat is carried of by the charge that the particle
carries Thus the more efficient the less energy required
to provide the eddy current grooves which occur only when there is
element resistance.
When the resistance is only the radiation resistance essentially less
heat is retained by the
element thus it stands to reason that the element becomes stable with
respect to temperature. As I have stated before the maximum efficiency
is when the input energy is applied to the particles alone where the
element resistance is zero a point that appears unattainable. So the
problem that hams have is to have a very low impeadance for maximum
efficiency which then is a matching problem divorced from the antenna
mechanics. The article thus has incorperated a very efficient tuning
method OR he has cut off the energy supply where as the energy applied
at the radiator is not the same as the
applied system energy.The big change in the perception of particles is
that they are not part of the element where it would be part of the
boundary equation.The element has external particles with minimul
energy at all times and where with a time varying field added
is a continual energy flow that carries away the applied energy via
the displacement current
as shown on my page. This article will provide some interesting
reading during the next few weeks after I get a print out.
Regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ....xg

Word to the wise
When looking at the boundarylaws with respect to statics we are
looking at an "instant"
of time where all is in a state of equilibrium and in a state of
balance. Because we are looking at a two dimensional form we can
ignore the mass of the particles as they are so small we can't measure
them so we view them as passive. The same would be true if we took
the step of adding elements along with the particles ie they would be
passive.
But there is an important point here in that it is a two dimensional
boundary and by adding a elemnt we are transforming it into a three
dimensional, thus the addition of elements or radiators will have an
effect on equilibrium or balance. Thus if elements are added they must
be in equilibrium and balanced which requires that the additions must
not upset
equilibrium of the whole package PLUS the between the constituent
parts. When we add a time varying field to the package then the
elements must be the length of one period or one wavelength since with
the addition of the two vectors( gravity and rotation) supplies a
equal and opposite force to the radiator in response to the lifting
and accelleration to the multiple particles which creates vibrational
movement on the radiator. In other words the elements and the static
particle change from passive to active thus requireing non fractional
wave length. If we are to look at energy in equals energy out
equations mechanical reaction forces must be counted as with applied
and displacement current.
Art Unwin KB9MZ....XG