On 2010-04-29,
zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435
wrote:
The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.
Really?!
Yep.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/0...t/tab/article/
He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
NOT a politician".
Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious!
Just trying my best.
This means two things:
1) That he is a liar.
You should know all about it, being a liar.
I do not say something like "I am NOT a usenet poster", unlike that
Tim Burns politician who says he is NOT a politician.
2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".
I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.
Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high).
Possibly, but that does not make Tim Burns any more trustworthy.
i