On Apr 30, 2:05*am, Kaleokualoha Kaleokualoha.
wrote:
Kevin Alfred Strom;705075 Wrote:





Liberty Net for Week of April 17-24

http://3950.net/2010/04/liberty-net-...f-april-17-24/

by Kevin Strom, WB4AIO

• The FBI has officially admitted that there was — when
there were
still patriots in the FBI — an FBI file on Obama’s
grandfather, and
they also admit that that file was destroyed. Was it because
BHO’s
grandfather was a friend of Communist Party member and drug dealer
Frank Marshall Davis? (15 minutes)

--
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/

If you actually READ the FBI statement responding to Kincaid’s
request for Stanley Dunham’s FBI records, it should be
immediately apparent that the FBI did NOT admit that it destroyed any
file on Obama’s grandfather. *This 26 March 2010 FBI letter
reads, in part:

“Records which may be responsive to your Freedom of
Information-Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request were destroyed on May 01,
1997. *Since the material could not be reviewed, it is not known if it
was responsive to your request.”
-http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/dunham.pdf
-http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=139737

Please note that the FBI only advised that “records which MAY be
responsive” were destroyed in 1997, but it is NOT KNOWN if they
actually apply. *From this kernel of truth, Kincaid has once again
fabricated evidence against Obama. *The FBI letter did not
“admit” that it had destroyed his grandfather’s file,
nor did it even confirm that it ever had an FBI file on his grandfather.
The FBI did NOT know if the 1997 destruction even contained a file on
Dunham. *

Nevertheless, Cliff Kincaid misrepresented the FBI’s vague
response as an ADMISSION that it had destroyed his grandfather’s
FBI file. *This is the essence of trumped-up evidence: *blatant
misrepresentation of evidence (the “big lie”). Other
disinformation campaigns may depend on viral rumors that are amplified
with each embellishment, or carefully designed false implications. *

This is just another of Kincaid’s redbaiting campaign, similar to
the trumped-up accusations from AIM regarding the 1949 Honolulu NAACP
incident (seehttp://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/Kaleokualoha/gG5kN7). *In
reporting that incident, as in reporting this incident, source documents
belie Kincaid’s claims. *

They each tell a “big lie” regarding public documents,
seemingly confident that nobody would have the audacity to research
their claims. * Just as Kincaid misrepresented the Congressional
testimony of rookie Honolulu NAACP board member Edward Berman, so too
has Kincaid misrepresented the FBI response to his Freedom of
Information Act request. *Kincaid’s minions drink their kool-aid
eagerly, because Cliff Kincaid is preaching to his own private choir.

For some reason, however, fewer websites have echoed Kincaid’s
claims this time. *Although there are 89,000 hits for “berman
Honolulu naacp davis,” there are only 12,000 hits for “fbi
admits dunham file.” *It seems the fringe is less receptive to
their “Ministry of Truth.” *

Perhaps they are learning (albeit belatedly) the difference between
professional propagandists (like Cliff Kincaid), and authentic
journalists who adhere to the Society of Professional Journalists Code
of Ethics (http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp).

"The men the American public admire most extravagantly are the most
daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to
tell them the truth."
- H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)

--
Kaleokualoha- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Huh, why would someone create a screen name 'literally' just to
respond to this post? Why not use your real screen name that you use?